VVested
US Investing··5 min read·Reviewed July 2026

PPFAS vs MOSL Nasdaq vs direct US ETFs: the 20-year cost comparison

Comparing Indian international mutual funds (PPFAS, Mirae, MOSL Nasdaq FoF) against direct US ETFs via LRS — expense ratios, tax treatment, and 20-year wealth outcomes.

Share:XLinkedInWhatsApp

You want US market exposure. Two routes exist for Indian residents: buy an Indian mutual fund that invests in the US (PPFAS Flexi Cap, Mirae Asset NYSE FANG+, MOSL Nasdaq 100 FoF) or invest directly in US ETFs via LRS (VTI, VOO, QQQ). The choice is not obvious — but the tax treatment asymmetry since April 2023 has shifted the math significantly.

Use the Indian funds vs direct US calculator to model your exact corpus over 10–20 years.


The key difference: how gains are taxed

This is the crux of the comparison.

Indian international mutual funds (post April 2023): Since the Finance Act 2023, all debt funds and international/overseas funds of funds are taxed at slab rates regardless of holding period. There is no LTCG treatment, no indexation. A 30% taxpayer holding PPFAS for 15 years pays 30% + surcharge + cess on the entire gain.

Direct US ETFs via LRS: Gains from direct US ETF holdings are taxed under Section 112 as capital gains:

  • Less than 24 months: STCG at slab rate
  • 24+ months: LTCG at 12.5% flat, no indexation

At a 30% + 4% cess = 31.2% tax rate, a 30% taxpayer saves 18.72 percentage points on gains at LTCG through direct investing vs an Indian international fund. Over 20 years of compounding, that is substantial.


Expense ratio comparison

Fund / RouteTER / CostNotes
PPFAS Flexi Cap Direct~0.58% p.a.Mixed India + international
Mirae Asset NYSE FANG+ FoF~0.56% p.a.Concentrated 10 tech stocks
MOSL Nasdaq 100 FoF~0.47% p.a.Tracks Nasdaq 100
Motilal Oswal S&P 500 Index Fund~0.51% p.a.S&P 500 index fund
VTI (direct via LRS)0.03% p.a.Total US market ETF
VOO (direct via LRS)0.03% p.a.S&P 500 ETF
QQQ (direct via LRS)0.20% p.a.Nasdaq 100 ETF

The Indian fund wrapper costs 0.45–0.55% more per year than direct. Over 20 years at 10% annual returns, an extra 0.5% in fees compounds to a ~10% gap in corpus — before the tax treatment differential.


The SEBI overseas limit risk

SEBI imposed an industry-wide $7 billion cap on overseas ETF investments by Indian mutual funds. In January 2022, when the limit was hit, all international fund houses stopped taking fresh subscriptions. The freeze lasted months.

This is a structural risk with Indian international funds: you may not be able to invest when you want to, and existing investors cannot add. Direct US ETF investors via LRS have no such restriction (beyond the $250,000 annual LRS cap per individual).


LRS friction vs fund simplicity

Direct US ETF (LRS route):

  • Requires opening a US brokerage account (INDmoney, Vested, IBKR, Schwab)
  • LRS remittance from Indian bank: 20% TCS above ₹10 lakh (recoverable at ITR)
  • Annual Schedule FA disclosure
  • Currency conversion at each investment

Indian international fund:

  • SIP via your existing mutual fund app — same UX as any Indian fund
  • No LRS, no TCS, no Schedule FA
  • But: slab-rate taxation and SEBI subscription limits

If your annual US investment is under ₹5 lakh and you're in the 20% slab, the simplicity of Indian international funds may outweigh the tax cost. Above ₹10 lakh/year or in the 30% slab, the LRS route almost always wins after 5+ years.


A 20-year worked comparison

Assumption: ₹1 lakh/year investment, 10% annual return (pre-tax, pre-fee), 30% income tax slab.

RouteEffective annual costTax on gainsApprox. 20-yr corpus (after tax)
MOSL Nasdaq 100 FoF0.47%31.2% on total gain≈₹38 lakh
Direct VTI (LRS)0.03%12.5% on gain (LTCG)≈₹49 lakh
Difference≈₹11 lakh

The direct route wins by roughly 29% in final corpus at this assumption set — driven primarily by the tax differential, not the fee differential. The calculator lets you vary the return assumption, investment amount, and holding period.


When Indian funds still make sense

  1. Very small amounts: Below ₹3–5 lakh/year, the LRS operational overhead (bank transfers, TCS tracking, Schedule FA) may not be worth it
  2. Lower tax brackets: At 20% slab, the tax differential narrows; simplicity wins more often
  3. Specific fund strategies: PPFAS Flexi Cap's India+international mix is genuinely a different product — not just a US index proxy
  4. No US brokerage access: Some platforms don't support small accounts or certain states

PPFAS specifically: it's not a pure US fund

PPFAS Flexi Cap allocates roughly 35–40% to international (mainly US) equities and 60–65% to Indian equities. It's a good actively managed multi-asset fund — but if you want US market beta, you're only getting partial exposure. The 0.58% TER and slab-rate taxation on a blended Indian+US fund is hard to justify vs direct VTI at 0.03% with LTCG treatment.


The one-line version

Indian international funds lost their tax advantage in April 2023. For a 30% taxpayer with a 5+ year horizon and ₹5 lakh+ annual US investment, direct US ETFs via LRS beat Indian fund wrappers by 20–30% in final corpus. Use the comparison calculator to see the gap on your specific numbers.

Run your own numbers

Try the calculators that match this post

Found this useful? Share it.

Help another Indian working with US RSUs or LRS not get blindsided by this stuff.

Share:XLinkedInWhatsApp

About the author

Arnav Grover
Arnav Grover

Co-Founder & Chief Product Officer, Rovia

IIT Bombay + IIM Calcutta. Founding PM at Aspora (largest NRI fintech). 6+ years covering Indian-resident US investing, LRS compliance, Schedule FA, and ITR-2 filing for AY 2026-27.

More about Arnav

Get more like this in your inbox

One practical post a week on US investing & RSU strategy.

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first.