PPFAS & MOSL Nasdaq vs direct US investing: which works better

For Indians who want US-equity exposure without dealing with the LRS, TCS, Schedule FA, and Form 67 (renumbered Form 44 from TY 2026-27), there's a tempting alternative: Indian mutual funds that hold US stocks. The most popular are PPFAS Flexi Cap (which holds ~35% US stocks within an Indian mutual fund wrapper) and the Motilal Oswal Nasdaq 100 FoF (which tracks the NDX index).

These are real options, with real tradeoffs. This post walks through how they work, when they're better than direct US investing via LRS, and when they're worse.

How Indian international funds work

Indian mutual funds are allowed to invest abroad up to certain SEBI/RBI-defined limits. There are roughly three structures:

Structure A: Domestic equity fund with foreign holdings

Example: PPFAS Parag Parikh Flexi Cap Fund.

This is an Indian mutual fund that, as a portion of its allocation, can invest in foreign stocks (typically up to 35%). PPFAS holds names like Alphabet, Meta, Microsoft within the fund.

You buy PPFAS rupees-in-rupees-out. From your perspective:

• It's an Indian mutual fund.
• You get a folio number, KYC, ITR Schedule MF treatment.
• You don't see USD anywhere.
• Capital gains and dividends are taxed under Indian listed equity rules (12.5% LTCG > 12 months, 20% STCG, ₹1.25 lakh exemption).

PPFAS handles the FX, the foreign tax compliance, the W-8BEN. You get clean rupee accounting.

Structure B: Fund of fund (FoF) tracking a foreign index

Example: Motilal Oswal Nasdaq 100 FoF.

This is an Indian mutual fund that invests in another fund — typically an offshore ETF tracking a US index. MOSL's Nasdaq 100 FoF, for instance, invests in an Ireland-domiciled or US-domiciled Nasdaq 100 ETF. The domicile of that underlying ETF matters for dividend leakage, as we explain in UCITS vs US-domiciled ETFs.

Tax treatment is different from Structure A:

• Until April 2023, FoFs holding international assets were taxed as debt funds (slab rate, 36-month threshold for LTCG, indexation).
• For units bought on or after April 2023, an international FoF is a non-equity ("specified") fund — it does not hold the 65% Indian equity an equity-oriented fund needs. Units acquired between April 2023 and March 2025 were taxed at slab rate regardless of holding period.
• For units bought on or after 1 April 2025, the treatment is: 12.5% LTCG (no indexation) if held over 24 months, otherwise slab rate. This is a genuine moving target — confirm current SEBI/IT Department guidance before relying on it.

The mechanics for the investor:

• You buy in INR. You get NAV in INR.
• All foreign tax/compliance is at the fund level.
• Indian capital gains apply per the current fund-classification rules.

Structure C: Direct overseas equity (via LRS)

This is what we've covered extensively in other posts. You yourself become the foreign equity holder via LRS. Direct US broker, direct compliance burden.

The comparison: PPFAS vs. Direct US investing

PPFAS is the most popular fund among Indian retail investors who want international exposure without leaving the rupee zone. Let's compare it to direct US investing on the dimensions that matter.

Dimension 1: Foreign exposure level

	Foreign exposure
PPFAS Flexi Cap	~35% (rest is Indian)
Direct US ETFs (your call)	100% of what you buy

If you allocate ₹10 lakh to PPFAS, only ~₹3.5 lakh of it is actually US-denominated. If you want 30% USD exposure in your overall portfolio, you'd need ~₹85 lakh in PPFAS to achieve ₹30 lakh of effective US exposure (with the rest being Indian).

By contrast, ₹30 lakh in VTI is a clean ₹30 lakh of US exposure.

Dimension 2: Tax treatment

	Tax on capital gains	Tax on dividends
PPFAS Flexi Cap	12.5% LTCG > 12 months (Indian listed eq.)	Reinvested in fund, taxed at fund level
Direct US (VTI)	12.5% LTCG > 24 months	25% US WH + Indian slab − FTC

PPFAS is structurally more tax-efficient for the equity portion:

• 12-month LTCG threshold (vs. 24 for direct US).
• ₹1.25 lakh annual LTCG exemption (vs. zero for direct US).
• No need for Form 67 or FTC tracking on dividends.

This is a meaningful advantage.

Dimension 3: Compliance burden

	What you have to do
PPFAS Flexi Cap	Standard Indian MF reporting in ITR, no foreign disclosure
Direct US (VTI)	Schedule FA, Form 67, Form A2 each remittance, ITR-2

PPFAS removes the entire foreign-asset reporting burden. For someone who values simplicity, this alone can justify the choice.

Dimension 4: Costs

	Expense ratio	FX markup	TCS implication
PPFAS Flexi Cap (regular)	1.6%	None visible (priced in NAV)	None
PPFAS Flexi Cap (direct)	0.7%	None visible	None
MOSL Nasdaq 100 FoF (direct)	0.5%	Built in	None
Direct US (VTI) via Vested	0.03% (VTI) + ~75 paise FX once	One-time per remittance	20% above ₹10L

Indian mutual funds have substantially higher expense ratios than US ETFs. PPFAS direct at 0.7% is 23x VTI's 0.03%. Over decades, the expense drag compounds: ₹10 lakh growing at 12% net of expenses is ₹86 lakh after 20 years; growing at 13.7% (the fund return + expense saved) is ₹1.21 cr — a 40% difference.

The expense ratio is the biggest long-term cost of Indian international funds vs. direct LRS.

Dimension 5: Foreign holdings limits

SEBI and RBI cap how much Indian mutual funds can collectively invest abroad. When that cap is reached, funds stop accepting new foreign investments — and often stop accepting new investor inflows altogether on their international portion.

This has happened:

• In 2022, SEBI/RBI hit the aggregate $7B industry cap (plus a $1B per-AMC cap and a separate $1B cap for overseas ETFs) on overseas MF investments. Many international funds (including MOSL Nasdaq) closed for new inflows.
• As of early 2026 the caps have not been raised: most overseas equity schemes and ETFs remain shut to fresh lump-sum and SIP inflows, with only a minority of schemes open as redemptions free up headroom. Check a fund's current subscription status before planning to invest.

Direct US investing under LRS has its own $250k/year limit per individual, but it's yours — not shared with all of India's MF investors.

Dimension 6: Specific stock control

PPFAS's foreign holdings are whatever they choose to hold. Currently weighted toward Alphabet, Meta, Microsoft. You don't control which.

Direct US investing: you pick. Want pure VTI? Buy it. Want a small allocation to ASML? Buy it (if your platform supports).

For someone with specific allocation views, direct US is better. For someone who's happy with "international exposure, blended large-cap," PPFAS-style funds are fine.

When PPFAS-style funds are better

You're investing under ₹10 lakh annually in international equity

The friction of LRS (TCS, Schedule FA, Form 67) is significant. For small amounts, the friction-to-benefit ratio is bad. PPFAS at higher expense but zero compliance is reasonable.

You don't want to file Schedule FA

Schedule FA is one of the highest-stakes filings in Indian tax. PPFAS removes it entirely. For someone who doesn't want to deal, PPFAS makes sense.

You're satisfied with PPFAS's portfolio choices

If you trust their fund management to pick the foreign exposure, you don't need to second-guess.

You want INR-clean accounting

For some, the mental overhead of managing USD positions, tracking USD/INR for cost basis, etc., is a real cost. INR-only funds reduce cognitive load.

When direct US investing is better

You're investing > ₹15 lakh annually

The expense ratio differential dominates. Over a 20-year horizon, 1.5% extra expense on Indian funds compounds to a substantial wealth gap.

You want specific exposures (QQQM, single stocks, international developed)

Indian funds with US exposure are blunt instruments. They give you "some US large-caps." If you want NASDAQ 100 specifically, or VEA for developed markets, or single tech stocks — direct investing across the 15 global markets we cover is the only path.

You want pure US allocation

PPFAS's 35% foreign cap is the limiting factor. If you want to allocate, say, 50% of your investable wealth to US assets, you can't do it through PPFAS alone.

You want to harvest US-stock-specific tax loss

Tax-loss harvesting at the per-stock level (not available at the fund level) requires direct ownership.

A blended approach

Most retail investors don't need to choose one or the other. A reasonable structure:

Allocation	Vehicle	Rationale
Indian core	UTI Nifty 50 / Motilal Nifty 500	Cheap, tax-efficient, broad
International "easy"	PPFAS Flexi Cap	INR-clean, no compliance, tax-efficient on equity gains
International "specific"	Direct US (VTI, QQQM, VEA) via LRS	Explicit US exposure, control

For someone with ₹50 lakh investable:

	Amount
Nifty 500 index	₹25 lakh
PPFAS Flexi Cap	₹15 lakh
Direct US (VTI/QQQM)	₹10 lakh

Effective USD exposure: ~30% (from PPFAS's 35% foreign + direct US).

Compliance burden: just the direct US portion (small, manageable).

What about the Motilal Oswal Nasdaq 100 FoF specifically?

This is a popular choice for "I want NASDAQ exposure but in INR." Let's compare to direct QQQM:

	MOSL Nasdaq 100 FoF	Direct QQQM
Tracks	NASDAQ 100	NASDAQ 100 (same index)
Expense ratio	~0.5%	0.15%
Tax treatment	Non-equity FoF: 12.5% LTCG (no indexation) if held over 24 months, else slab	12.5% LTCG over 24 months for foreign equity
Compliance	Indian MF	Schedule FA, Form 67
Buy/redeem	INR, daily NAV	USD, intraday market
Inflow availability	Subject to SEBI/RBI overseas caps	Subject to your own LRS

The MOSL FoF saves you the foreign compliance, but it does not get the favourable equity-fund treatment — as a non-equity FoF it shares the same 24-month LTCG threshold as direct foreign equity (12.5% over 24 months, slab below), with no Rs 1.25 lakh exemption, at the cost of ~0.35% extra expense and dependence on the FoF's category status.

For "I want some NASDAQ exposure and don't want to deal with foreign compliance," MOSL FoF is reasonable. For larger amounts or precise control, direct QQQM via LRS is better.

A comparison table at typical investor sizes

For someone with ₹X annual investing budget, what's the optimal structure?

₹2 lakh/year

Recommended	100% Indian: Nifty 500 + maybe a small PPFAS allocation
Avoid	Direct LRS — friction dominates

₹10 lakh/year

Recommended	Nifty 500 + PPFAS, OR Nifty 500 + direct US (your choice based on simplicity preference)
Either route	Both work; PPFAS simpler, direct US slightly more tax-efficient at scale

₹30 lakh/year

Recommended	Direct US via LRS preferred. Higher expense of Indian funds starts to matter.
Use PPFAS for	Filling in international developed exposure, or as a "tax-bracket-saver" piece

₹100 lakh/year

Recommended	Heavy direct US via LRS or IBKR. The expense savings on $50-100k/year of investment are significant.
Indian MF role	Limited; mostly for the Indian leg, not international.

The summary

Indian international funds (PPFAS, MOSL Nasdaq) are genuine alternatives to direct US investing for small-to-medium investors. They trade simplicity (no Schedule FA, no Form 67) for higher expense ratios.

Use them when:

• You're investing under ₹10–15 lakh/year in international equity.
• You don't want to file foreign-asset disclosures.
• You're happy with the fund's allocation choices.

Use direct US (via LRS) when:

• You're investing > ₹20 lakh/year.
• You want specific allocations (NASDAQ tilt, international developed, single stocks).
• You can tolerate Schedule FA / Form 67 once a year.

For most professionals with growing portfolios, the answer over time is "start with PPFAS, transition to direct US as portfolio scales." The break-even point is somewhere in the ₹10–25 lakh annual investing range — below it, simplicity wins; above it, cost wins.